How to approach it
What a strong answer needs to show
Make your role visible
A teamwork answer needs enough context to understand the group, but the scoring evidence should remain centred on what you actually contributed.
- State the shared goal and your role.
- Describe a specific contribution or decision.
- Separate your actions from the team's overall achievement.
Show how you worked with different perspectives
Radiologists routinely work with referrers, radiographers, nurses, physicists, managers and other specialties.
- Listen for the other person's clinical or operational concern.
- Explain disagreement using evidence and patient impact rather than hierarchy.
- Escalate respectfully when safety cannot be resolved at your level.
Demonstrate follow-through and reflection
Teamwork is not complete when the conversation ends; strong examples show what happened next.
- Close the loop on agreed actions.
- Check that important information reached the right people.
- Reflect on how the team could work better next time.
Explain the expertise that changed the shared plan
A useful teamwork account identifies what another person knew that you did not. In an imaging discussion, the referrer may clarify the treatment decision, while a radiographer may identify an acquisition or practical safety constraint.
- Describe how that information affected the next step. Listening is demonstrated by a changed or better-supported decision, not by naming every profession involved.
- Keep responsibilities distinct: another professional's contribution is not yours to claim, and explaining a clinical question does not give you authority to decide every imaging issue. Involve the appropriate senior where the disagreement or risk exceeds your role.
- Finish with who accepted the agreed action and how the referrer received the outcome. If you do not know the later patient outcome, say what you checked rather than claiming the whole pathway succeeded.
Original practice questions
Questions worth practising aloud
These are original preparation prompts written around published domains and entry-level expectations. They are not recalled interview questions.
- Tell us about a team where your contribution made a practical difference.
- Describe a disagreement within a team and how the final decision was reached.
- What role do you tend to take in teams, and can you give an example?
- Tell us about a time another team member's perspective changed your approach.
- How would you handle a referrer who strongly disagrees with your view?
Common mistakes
Where otherwise good answers lose clarity
- Describing an impressive team while your own contribution remains unclear.
- Treating disagreement as something to win rather than resolve safely.
- Using hierarchy alone to justify a decision.
- Finishing the story without explaining the outcome or what you learned.
Preparation plan
How to practise this deliberately
- Prepare examples of collaboration, disagreement, informal leadership and receiving another perspective.
- Practise describing your role in one sentence before giving the detail.
- Use examples from clinical teams even if they were not in Radiology.
- Link teamwork to referrer communication, MDT working and safe escalation in Radiology.
Continue into practice
Practise the answer, not just the reading
Spoken Radiology ST1 practice is launching soon. At launch, choose a Question bank prompt, work on your answer and use structured feedback to improve it. Explore the practice experience while you prepare with these free questions.
Explore Radiology ST1 practiceOfficial source
Check the live recruitment guidance
Interview formats can change between cycles. This focused guide should be used alongside the official source below and the full Radiology ST1 guide.
- NHS England — Clinical Radiology ST1 interviews
- RCR: current Clinical Radiology curriculumThe current linked curriculum covers imaging decisions, communication, team working and graded supervision. It describes progression through training, not independent ST1-entry competence.
- GMC: colleagues, culture and safetyParagraphs 49 and 65-67: colleagues' expertise, continuity and appropriate delegation.