Skip to content

Clinical Fellow & Trust Grade · Evidence pack

Clinical Fellow evidence pack and letter drafts

Build verifiable evidence for a local fellow job with supervisor-editable drafts for tasters, teaching, QI, research and leadership, without inventing scores.

Last verified: 13 October 2026Part of: Clinical Fellow & Trust Grade
Recruitment and training source status

No national Clinical Fellow recruitment year, station blueprint or portfolio tariff. The employer's person specification, interview invitation and written contract control this post; GMC standards are UK-wide, and the cited 2026 LED contract transition is England-specific and still in progress.

ContentsBuild evidence that survives a follow-up question

Verification, not portfolio theatre

Build evidence that survives a follow-up question

Most local fellow adverts do not publish a national portfolio score. Keep a small private index of the achievements you actually need to prove for this vacancy. Share only requested material and remove patient identifiers.

Clinical attachment or taster confirmation

Draft for supervisor editing: '[Name] attended [department/site] from [date] to [date], for [days/hours]. Activities observed or performed under supervision were [accurate details]. This was [observational/clinical] and does not by itself certify independent competence.'

Draft template · adapt to your own evidence
Supervisor: please correct any inaccurate wording before signing. Include your name, role, organisation, dates, duration, actual activity, level of supervision and contact details.

Replace the placeholders with accurate details. Any signatory must verify the statements.

Teaching confirmation

Draft: '[Name] designed/delivered [topic] to [audience] on [dates] for [number] sessions. Their own contribution was [specific work]. Feedback or measured outcome: [actual result, or state not collected].'

Draft template · adapt to your own evidence
Supervisor: edit all dates, audience, frequency, role and outcome to match records. Do not attest to sessions not delivered.

Replace the placeholders with accurate details. Any signatory must verify the statements.

QI and audit confirmation

Draft: '[Name] contributed to [project] between [dates]. They were responsible for [defined contribution]. Baseline [measure]; intervention [what actually changed]; remeasurement [result or not yet completed].'

Draft template · adapt to your own evidence
Supervisor: distinguish audit from a completed improvement cycle; delete any unverified outcome before signing.

Replace the placeholders with accurate details. Any signatory must verify the statements.

Research or leadership confirmation

Draft: '[Name] held [role] from [date] to [date] and personally delivered [work]. Output [publication, presentation, policy or other verifiable result], with [actual status].'

Draft template · adapt to your own evidence
Supervisor: confirm precise authorship/role, dates, contribution and output; do not describe a submission as an accepted publication.

Replace the placeholders with accurate details. Any signatory must verify the statements.

Fictional completed index

Connect a claim to a record and a limitation

Keep an index for your own preparation; send only what the employer requests through its approved route. A useful entry lets you retrieve the evidence and explain exactly what it does and does not establish.

Teaching entry

Claim: delivered three undergraduate bedside sessions. Record: dated plans, attendance totals and anonymised feedback; registrar observed one session. Personal role: designed and delivered the sessions. Limit: feedback assessed usefulness, not a change in knowledge. Follow-up to prepare: what changed between the first and last session?

Improvement entry

Claim: contributed to a discharge-summary project. Record: agreed measurement sheet, baseline collection and minutes accepting a proposed checklist. Personal role: defined two data fields with the supervisor and collected the baseline. Limit: checklist not yet introduced and no remeasurement. Accurate description: baseline audit and planned change; not a completed improvement cycle.

Clinical experience entry

Claim: supervised acute medicine experience during a four-month post. Record: dates, job description and supervisor confirmation of actual responsibilities. Limit: no independent registrar take. Keep reflections de-identified; patient notes, screenshots and identifiable case logs are not suitable application exhibits.

Make confirmation easy to verify

Send a supervisor a short factual draft with dates and source records, asking them to correct it. Do not prefill praise or claim an outcome they did not observe. Reconcile the final wording with the CV and application. Keep a private index of file name, date, verifier and related criterion, rather than a folder of unexplained certificates.

From understanding to practice

Put this topic into an interview answer

Use CV, teaching and QI for original prompts and an answer structure relevant to this topic.

Explore Clinical Fellow & Trust Grade practiceExplore the Question bank and spoken practice coming at launch.

Spoken practice is launching soon. Use the free questions and guides to start preparing now.

Sources

References linked in this article

Clinical Fellow & Trust Grade hub sources